Science I Science II Language
Buiseness and Government Social and Behavioral Arts and Humanities  
back to the home page
Information about the project
Discipline clusters
Scedules for regional and statewide meetings
Participation and Expense Reimbursement forms
Links of interest and other resources
Lead faculty coordinators
 
2001-2002 IMPAC Annual Report

Introduction Letter

Biology

Proposed Biology Core Curriculum

CAN BIOL Sequence A and Relevant Course Descriptors

General Education Major Preparation for Science and Engineering

CSU and UC Core Curricula: Length of Core, Courses, Units and Prerequisites

Current ELC Summit Agreement of March 13, 1987

The Intersegmental Major Preparation Articulated Curriculum for Engineering Programs

Appendix A

Agriculture

Business Information Systems: CAN 6
Revised Business Information Systems: CAN 6

California Geographical Society Annual Meeting

 

 

Back   Forward   Printable PDF Home

Engineering

James Shackelford, Lead Discipline Faculty
UC Davis

Engineering has been added as a discipline within IMPAC during the 2001-02 year. In December, Professor James F. Shackelford of UC Davis was designated as the Lead Faculty Member for the Engineering Discipline. Professor Shackelford's initial meeting was at the January 5, 2002 Meeting in Sacramento. The only other participant for Engineering at that meeting was Denise Van Horn-Landre, Articulation Officer at Las Positas College in Livermore. Ms. Van Horn-Landre's participation and perspective were most useful.

With the effective introduction to IMPAC provided by the January meeting, Professor Shackelford made an IMPAC presentation to the Engineering Liaison Committee (ELC) at its semi-annual meeting at UC Davis on March 14, 2002. He encouraged those involved in the articulation function for engineering (the core mission of the ELC) to become aware of the parallel efforts of IMPAC and to become involved in the IMPAC activities. There was a good core group of people attending the April IMPAC meeting at LAX, including Ms. Van Horn-Landre, other participants from community colleges, and some from the UC. There were unfortunately no CSU participants, and CSU involvement will be a priority for the coming year.

Professor Shackelford has prepared a copy of the historical "Summit Agreement" of the ELC and circulated it at the March ELC meeting and the April IMPAC meeting (Appendix A). This is a long-established, general description of the lower-division program for a typical engineering student at either a community college or a four-year institution. Various forms of the Summit Agreement have guided articulation in engineering for roughly half of the ELC's 55-year history. Professor Shackelford translated the Summit Agreement into a format similar to that developed by Professor Schiffman for a Science-alternative to IGETC (Appendix B).

The consensus of the engineering group at the April meeting was that expanded dialogue between IMPAC and the ELC would be mutually beneficial and that a meeting of at least the engineering group within IMPAC should be held in conjunction with the Fall Meeting of the ELC. (The dialogue at the April meeting benefited substantially by having the participation of Darlene Mathias of Cosumnes River College, Chair of the Community College Segment of the ELC.) We also felt that IMPAC - Engineering is a valuable advising tool but should not be codified in the way that IGETC has been. We also felt that at least two versions of IMPAC - Engineering would be appropriate for a) mechanical/civil engineering and b) electrical/computer engineering.

Appendix A
Appendix B

 
Back   Forward   Printable PDF Home
 
 
©IMPAC Project